![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
surely the increase in boost pressure that he's lookin to gain from doing this will over compensate the loss of compression!
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
but the ET is already a low compression engine, at 8:1 it's lower than a lot of turbo engines of the same era, newer turbo engines seem to be running a lot higher CR. the Audi/VW 1.8T is 9.5:1 for instance. IMO you don't need to go lower than 8:1. The engine I'm building will have re-worked combustion chambers but I will skim the head to compensate |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
i thought the ET was 8.5:1
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nope its defo 8:1.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
no, the DET it 8.5:1 the difference is almost entirely down to the larger chamber volume of the head, the pistons aren't dimensionally much different really |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I skimmed 40thou of my head when I rebuilt so i reckon my CR is 8:5 - 9.0:1. No problems with detonation so far, i plan on using water injection if I hear any when I up the boost further.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I make that about 8.7:1
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah I make it 8.65:1 with 83mm pistons, and with 84mm pistons 8.85:1
|
![]() |
|
|