|
|
|
 /
 /
 /
 /
 /
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
19-02-2007, 08:03
|
||||
|
||||
i currently have a 2.5" system with a single Jetex medium length oval silencer which exits thru rear of passenger door. That runs static at tested rpm 4350(suppossedly 2/3rds of max
 ) at between 98 and 102Dbs. variance is generally how up to temp engine is and how good the testing equipment is. Ironically although it registers apprx 100Db static, its quieter on track than some of the mildly modified V6s that register 89-96Db. The turbo does a great job of chopping up the sound pulses when under load. Im gonna lag the system from manifold all the way to tail pipe which will help a bit (and stop cooking me!)Whaddya reckon?
__________________
 Racing is life. Everything else, before and after, is just waiting. - Steve McQueen Last edited by CNHSS1; 19-02-2007 at 12:10. 
|
|
#2
19-02-2007, 12:17
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought most tracks made you be under 96db now?, lagging should help, the tubular manifold will make it quite a bit louder. I'd run that Jetex box in the middle and a 3 inch tail pipe silencer personally. If you make it from Mild steel it will be a nicer sound too
|
|
#3
19-02-2007, 12:31
|
||||
|
||||
|
no sprint hillclimb regs are 105Dbs except where thats over ruled by the venue, but i can only really think of Castle Combe which is 102. Think its summat to do with the fact most venues have planning permission for so many days a year at higher levels, but all the other dates such as track days etc come under normal planning noise restrictions.
Thanks for the suggestions re exh. I was gonna use mild due to it being a bit lighter and bit more ductile than SS. should as you say, take the crackle of the exh note too.
__________________
Racing is life. Everything else, before and after, is just waiting. - Steve McQueen
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
