S12OC UK Forum  
S12 World Affiliate Program
S12 United Kingdom / Club-S12 International / / S12 France / S12 Eastern Europe / S12 Sweden

Go Back   S12OC UK Forum > Main Categories > S12 Discussion
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-05-2006, 18:41
PukkaSilvia's Avatar
PukkaSilvia PukkaSilvia is offline
Club Founder
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sussex
Posts: 7,580
PukkaSilvia will become famous soon enoughPukkaSilvia will become famous soon enough
Default

That flywheel conversion makes no sence to me whatsoever lol. You cant gain power through your propshaft and diff

With an 18% power loss through transmission drag you would run a wheel figure of 362.85bhp.

That is still an awesome wheel horsepower figure and flywheel figure though.


Unless the Rolling road operator has got confused and that graph is the wheel figure like on most rolling roads. Ie they worked out that figure to be the wheel figure off the flywheel. the graph states otherwise though
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by s13eater View Post
i wished my cams cost only £130 each, i must have c*nt wrote on my head
www.chaileygarage.co.uk

Last edited by PukkaSilvia; 04-05-2006 at 18:54.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-05-2006, 20:29
Japster's Avatar
Japster Japster is offline
PAID MEMBER
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 163
Japster is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pukkasilvia
That flywheel conversion makes no sence to me whatsoever lol. You cant gain power through your propshaft and diff

With an 18% power loss through transmission drag you would run a wheel figure of 362.85bhp.

That is still an awesome wheel horsepower figure and flywheel figure though.


Unless the Rolling road operator has got confused and that graph is the wheel figure like on most rolling roads. Ie they worked out that figure to be the wheel figure off the flywheel. the graph states otherwise though

sh*t! - Sorry Rob/Pukka - That's a good point - I'll check, but it was Thor themselves (Peter and Lyndon) who worked out it had just made 520bhp (Same when it made 419 on the last graph - Lyndon had pointed out that the figure was from the wheels - then told me that that equated to just shy of 490bhp at the Flywheel) - It may be the "fly" heading is wrong - Forgot about that, but I'll check with the guys - It was a hub dyno though, if that makes a difference on why the heading says Flywheel?

The calculation was me adding the 18% back (I see the confusion given that heading), but I'm 100% certain that although the top heading does indeed say "Flywheel", the figure was measured from the hubs, as it's where the measuring equipment was attached! - Hence they had a known figure at the wheels, then added the loss back in to get the verbally quoted Flywheel figure...

Hope that helps - I'll double check with Thor tomorrow, as my rep's at stake , but I already know the answer...


Come to think of it, I reckon the true test will be to take Pukka (as he's a kosher unbiased kind of guy ) out in the ol' beast, drop the clutch, and get some proper feedback regarding how many horses he reckons she has!
__________________
Only 450+ BHP from a 1.8? (Well, until I can run big boost again ) - Still, back on the road and looking for victims - Muhaahaahaaa!....

Yep - I fookin' love me beast ...


Last edited by Japster; 04-05-2006 at 20:34.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:33.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.