S12OC UK Forum  
S12 World Affiliate Program
S12 United Kingdom / Club-S12 International / / S12 France / S12 Eastern Europe / S12 Sweden

Go Back   S12OC UK Forum > Main Categories > S12 Discussion
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 19-07-2006, 22:29
wacomuk's Avatar
wacomuk wacomuk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 677
wacomuk is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Silvia
assuming you're both right, there is either a lot of variation in finished weights, or there's three kilos difference in weight depending on which mk flywheel you have
the fly wheel i weighed was from a mk2 it deffo weighed in at 25lbs heavy fooker
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20-07-2006, 00:16
Dr Silvia's Avatar
Dr Silvia Dr Silvia is offline
PAID MEMBER
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Haywards Heath
Posts: 761
Dr Silvia will become famous soon enoughDr Silvia will become famous soon enough
Default

well 25 pounds = 11.34 Kg's so the confusion still stands... are you 100% on that stock flywheel weight CNHSS??

Last edited by Dr Silvia; 20-07-2006 at 12:51.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 20-07-2006, 00:19
PukkaSilvia's Avatar
PukkaSilvia PukkaSilvia is offline
Club Founder
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sussex
Posts: 7,580
PukkaSilvia will become famous soon enoughPukkaSilvia will become famous soon enough
Default

You would expect them to be lighter on the mk2 hopefully. We need to find out 100%
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by s13eater View Post
i wished my cams cost only £130 each, i must have c*nt wrote on my head
www.chaileygarage.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 20-07-2006, 00:30
Dr Silvia's Avatar
Dr Silvia Dr Silvia is offline
PAID MEMBER
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Haywards Heath
Posts: 761
Dr Silvia will become famous soon enoughDr Silvia will become famous soon enough
Default

it would be logical

when adam and i took the flywheel off of my mk1 engine and compared it to the mk2 wheel it was definately different...

without access to the bathroom scales however i didnt get the opportunity to compare on the spot
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 20-07-2006, 01:25
adzs12's Avatar
adzs12 adzs12 is offline
Forum Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,862
adzs12 will become famous soon enough
Default

Im sure i have a mk1 and 2 flywheel kicking about still so il weigh the 2 when i get a chance I definately remember the difference doc when we compared the 2
__________________


Currently 226.4bhp@13psi with a remap to 18psi coming very soon
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 20-07-2006, 03:38
Dr Silvia's Avatar
Dr Silvia Dr Silvia is offline
PAID MEMBER
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Haywards Heath
Posts: 761
Dr Silvia will become famous soon enoughDr Silvia will become famous soon enough
Default

good man
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 20-07-2006, 09:49
30psi's Avatar
30psi 30psi is offline
PAID MEMBER
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,456
30psi will become famous soon enough
Default

I've got a lightened flywheel (that no one has bought yet).

I remember when I checked, it was 4lbs lighter but thats with bathroom scales which isnt the best way to measure the difference.

You notice the engine is more responsive at idle but it doesnt make a huge difference when driving.

Thay flywheel is pretty expensive and such an item is really only beneficial on something with a fully balanced, knife edged bottom end assembly.

A lightened flywheel doesnt reduce the torque at idle (as most like to believe) it actually reduces its inertia. So if you are clumsy with the clutch you lose the inertia quickly. Its a way of storing energy.

I would only be concerned when using a tight arsed bastard paddle clutch with a light flywheel as you are much more likely to kill the little inertia the flywheel has.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 20-07-2006, 10:22
CNHSS1's Avatar
CNHSS1 CNHSS1 is offline
PAID MEMBER
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: shrewsbury
Posts: 606
CNHSS1 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

sorry for the confusion, i was relying on my memory regarding the original weight, so you may be right with the 11.5 or 11.34kgs, but the machined weights are correct.

Pukka
sorry for the confusion, my point was more that someone fitting a 4.5kg flywheel in a silvia with std ecu (where it cant be remapped to help the slow running) would make the car a pain in day to day use. My car weighs 750kgs, uses a 9.5kg fly and AP paddle and nismo cover and is crap at anything below 20mph. Luckily its only for moving around the paddock or pits but it does p*ss me right off. Couldnt put up with it in a road car. I would have thought that a heavier car (silvias are 11-1200kgs right?) would be worse still.

As for the fly, it does look the nuts, just wish they did one to suit the ET bolt pattern
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 20-07-2006, 10:41
30psi's Avatar
30psi 30psi is offline
PAID MEMBER
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,456
30psi will become famous soon enough
Default

Craig, your right the issue comes when driving over speed humps and shit like that where there is slack on the transmission. A nice flywheel dampens this.

A lumpy idle won't be dampened by the flywheel and it will idle worse. On a multi cylinder engine you can get away with it more.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 20-07-2006, 13:10
Dr Silvia's Avatar
Dr Silvia Dr Silvia is offline
PAID MEMBER
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Haywards Heath
Posts: 761
Dr Silvia will become famous soon enoughDr Silvia will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30psi
I've got a lightened flywheel (that no one has bought yet).
arent you using it in that datsun you bought??
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:17.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.